Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt

from the 1st-responders dept

This week, the two our winners on the insightful aspect are nameless responses to commenters trotting out the exact same previous, boring, conveniently dismissed arguments about information moderation on our post about how pretty minor articles moderation has anything to do with politics. In initially area, it’s a reaction to somebody generally just expressing “nuh-uh, of course it does”:

Ummm… This total article details out how social media has zero fucks to give about your political affiliation, they just really don’t want fucking assholes on their provider.

That you take into account the people today acquiring banned from social media for getting fucking assholes, ie racists, homophobic, xenophobic, misogynistic, bigoted assholes, is getting biased in direction of conservatives, it’s possible you really should choose a lengthy tricky appear at the firm you want to keep and why you simply call by yourself a conservative.

In next location, it is a response to somebody insisting that Techdirt’s have remark flagging method is abused for political factors:

You are a fucking abusive troll.

It is not that we really do not like your politics, its that we never like fucking assholes like you.

Hell, for all you know, we could be aligned politically, it’s just that I never act like a fucking asshole.

Why really do not you individuals ever master, it is not your politics we do not like, its you, the fucking asshole.

For editor’s preference on the insightful aspect, we’ve received a pair of feedback from Stephen T. Stone. 1st, a remark about why platforms really do not make their moderation regulations much more obvious and specific:

But that allows “I’m not touching you”–type regulations-lawyering assholes to glance for loopholes in the program and exploit them. That produces an infinite feedback loop in which the mods test to correct the loopholes, only to open more loopholes, which the assholes will exploit, and repeat until finally the rules are so microdetailed that men and women can scarcely put up everything devoid of breaking the policies.

The complete level of acquiring some vagueness at the rear of moderation selections is to enable for on-the-fly adaptation to situations admins did not count on when they wrote the regulations. Just take absent that vagueness and you get the responses loop of “rules lawyering ➡️ fix the policies ➡️ exploit the policies ➡️ rules lawyering…”, which does no person any excellent.

Upcoming, a remark about the lawsuit from Barnes & Noble in Virginia:

Republicans went from “don’t read that e book in class” to “yank it from the library” to “fuck you, nobody must be ready to purchase this” in the span of a 12 months. Welcome to the “openly fascist with no apologies” phase of American conservatism.

In excess of on the humorous aspect, our to start with area winner is an nameless reaction to the assertion that Twitter blocking tales about Hunter Biden’s laptop computer swung the election:

Which is it I’m not gonna vote for hunter now!

In second spot, it is Flakbait with a remark about Hertz refusing to fall prosecutions regardless of currently being sued for bogus theft stories:

Outdoing Avis

For a lot of a long time, beginning in the early 60s, Avis – scaled-down than Hertz – performed on their #2 rental car business position with the slogan, “We Test Harder.” It would seem that Hertz’s engage in on that capture phrase is, “We’ll Trial You More challenging.”

For editor’s choice on the amusing facet, we’ve received a pair of responses about California’s blatantly unconstitutional monthly bill enabling mom and dad to sue sites since their young children are depressed. First, it is That One Dude with an strategy about turning the tables:

Easy way to turn this about if they experienced the guts

California: If social media does just about anything that might make young children even worse off and/or they come about to serve as a good scapegoat for that they’ll be sued.

Social media: All right, effectively we’ll be hard this blatant unconstitutional Seem At Us Accomplishing Something/Think of The Children invoice but until then we’ll be prohibiting any man or woman below 18 and who life in california from using our platforms, and you’d much better consider we’re likely to be telling them precisely who to blame for that.

California: But… that’s us, you can’t blame us when we’re striving to blame everything on you! Our young ones are likely to scream our ears off!

Past but not least, it’s Blake Stacey with one more way of searching at it:

Now, now, let us not be hasty. This entire “suing for the reason that the young children are depressed” strategy may well have probable. For illustration, how about we sue politicians since the kids are frustrated around their world remaining fucked.

That’s all for this 7 days, individuals!